False testing on questionable pandemic?

Here is an article that came out on Global Research.

My posts on Facebook are sometimes disappearing or getting harder to find, especially in the period covering last two months. So I decided to place more of my contend here.

Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for Any Strain of a Coronavirus, Not Specifically for COVID-19

Above is the title and the link to the original article. I do not know how long it might last, so am copying the test here.

It starts with:
The following is from a medical forum. The writer, who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US, prefers to stay anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. – Julian Rose

And then:

I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.

This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.

The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.

The problem is the test is known not to work.

It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.

Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.

The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.

And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.

If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.

If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.

And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.

Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.

They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive

PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.

There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.

All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.

Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.

You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.

Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.

Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.

Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.

But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.

1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.

2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.

3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.

4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.

Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.

They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Anyhow, read the article. It gives much information on what exactly is the Coronavirus family and what exactly is being tested and why the test is rubbish.

Don Huber questions COVID-19 lockdown

Don has been studying glyphosate for nearly 40 years and claims he has never found another molecule as intriguing, bewildering and deadly, as glyphosate.

He once told me that if he himself was a terrorist, a smart biochemist, and seriously wanted to harm USA in a clever way so that by the time the people wake up to it, it’d be too late to undo the health damage to hundreds of millions of people – he could not have invented a better agent than glyphosate. And now the terrorists can sit back and laugh, because USA was doing it to itself without external terrorists.

There is another way to introduce Don Huber. Most folks know of MIT scientist Dr. Stephanie Seneff. She, along with cellular biologist Anthony Samsel have written six peer reviewed science papers on Glyphosate as a pathway to countless diseases. I have peronsally spoken with and interviewed both Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff many times.

Stephanie feels indebted to Don for pointing this intriguing molecule glyphosate to her many years ago, which essentially changed Stephanie’s academic focus from that day on.

Many years ago, she attended a seminar where she was asked to speak. There was Don Huber, who was also asked to speak, and before Stephanie Seneff. At that time, Dr. Seneff did not know anything about glyphosate and had not even heard the name of the molecule.

Dr. Don Huber, who had pathology as his subject and specialised on plant pathology, spoke about this molecule glyphosate, and said this was a very intriguing herbicide and a potentially devastating slow killer for the animal kingdom in ways no other poison could do, and that science needs to do a lot more research on this molecule.

That speech, according to Dr. Stephanie Seneff, essentially transformed her research work from that day on – and her focus turned has remained primarily on glyphosate for so many years, till today.

Anyhow, Don gave me permission to quote him on this comment that I received through an email from him. This is about the Coronavirus.

Tony,
From another medical study, it appears that Covid -19 was being freely disseminated (unknowingly at the time) in various areas in late November 2019.  Using the models for exponential spread from one person (using the spreading in November, two months earlier than projected), we should have approximately 100+ million exposed and recovered people already out of 330 million or about 30 % of the population.  THERE IS NO REASON WHY MANY OF THESE PEOPLE SHOULDN’T BE BACK TO NORMAL ACTIVITY and not sequestered.  Based on this model, ANOTHER 100 MILLION ARE PROBABLY INFECTED BUT IN THE INCUBATION OR EARLY RECOVERING STAGE (60% OF THE POPULATION THAT IS ALREADY COMMITTED AND ANY LOCKDOWN WILL HAVE LITTLE EFFECT. This is approaching a “self quenching (curling) stage where the pandemic ENDS (see curve for China)! WHY ARE WE EVEN CONSIDERING DESTROYING OUR ECONOMY AND FREEDOM? Although flattening the curve provides time for medical support during the crunch period but also extends the pandemic.
Don
Problems faced on Facebook
I have had some oddities with my posts on Facebook and also on other posts or references to articles that question the wisdom behind the declaration of Coronavirus as a pandemic and if it is a serious enough threat to warrant an economic lockdown of the planet. I find such references being possibly censored on FB. Also a lot of my recent posts disappearing from my own wall since I started posting about the Coronavirus thing hit the media. But somehow most of these are staying intact on my private FB group Not Sasi.
Since then I decided to also shift some of my posts to this blog, which it is hoped would offer better preservation.