More from Dr. Thierry Vrain on GMO

Our talk with noted Canadian soil biologist and retired genetic engineer, Dr. Thierry Vrain was partially covered in an earlier blog, as linked below, which included 4 video clips and one podcast. The first three video trio were about their loverly organic farm. The last one, part 4, was about GMO and the health risk it might carry.

In this video he further elaborates on the bad science behind the GMO technology on one side, and the absence of third party independent testing of the GMO products to assess health risks on the other.

Dr. Thierry Vrain

Dr. Thierry Vrain

Just like part 4, this video too has been converted into an audio podcast as well, so that folks wanting to store the audio podcast in their iPhone or iPod can do so by subscribing to it on iTunes. If you wish to locate the podcast, open iTunes and type “Tonu” in the top right search field and then check the podcast section of the search result. For those that wish to be notified when an additional blog appears, consider clicking the follow (RSS) button at the top right of this blog.

Thierry Vrain – Part 5: Dr. Vrain exposes the dichotomy with regard to GMO feed, where it is substantially equivalent so it does not need to be subjected to safety test on one side, and same time it is totally different from non-GMO food so that it can be granted a patent, on the other side.

[youtube aLFKu3VICgE]

Dr. Ramu of Centre of Sustainable Agriculture, India

Here we include a podcast involving a talk with Dr. Ramu of India, on sustainable agriculture.

Dr. Ramanjeneyulu, or Dr. Ramu is short, is a noted agricultural scientist in India, and the executive director of the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, whose work involves finding solutions to, and helping the farmers to rediscover pesticide free, debt free model of agriculture that would make farming once again a profitable and sustainable profession.

CSA focuses on developing and promoting locally adapted farming systems, sustainable farming practices. Organic Farming, Non Pesticidal Management, Open Source Seeds, Ethno-veterinary practices water conservation etc are practiced to promote ecological and economic sustainability.

Dr. Ramu

Dr. Ramu

Dr. Ramu has been invited in late May 2013 to Charlotte, North Carolina, provide the keynote speech at the annual conference of Association for India’s Development (AID), a registered Non-profit Organisation in the US that are involved with, among other things, grassroots movements in helping farming to find a sustainable platform, away from the debt inducing and pesticide laden industrial agri-model that is proving to be disastrous to the Indian farmers as well as to ecology and rural economy.

I spoke with him on phone, to learn more of the current situation in India, of his remarkable work, and also about what he might speak about in his keynote speech in North Carolina later this month. We also discussed what might be a good topic for a tentative panel discussion involving Dr. Ramu as well as participants from North America, on topic such as importance of small family farm sustainability on a global scale as a buffer to ensure food security for the planet.

Below is the 13 minute podcast. For your feedback, you may write to tonu@tonu.org or tony.mitra@gmail.com.

Dr. Thierry Vrain on faulty science behind GMO technology

Presenting an audio podcast and a series of video clips about Dr. Thierry Vrain, organic farmer and retired genetic engineer. He explains how the GMO technology is based on a faulty assumption that has since been proven wrong by more recent study of genome ecosystem of living organisms.

Tony, Thierry & Chanchal

Tony, Thierry & Chanchal

Thierry lives in lovely Comox Valley on the east coast of Vancovuer Island, in the Canadian province of British Columbia.

In these video clips, myself, Anu, and Peggy visit the Innisfree farm, or Thierry Vrain and Chanchal Cabrera. Chanchal was busy teaching a class in her farm.

Dr. Vrain with Peggy and Tony in his farm

Dr. Vrain with Peggy and Tony in his farm

Thierry took us around Chanchal’s Teaching garden, and later around his organic farm and discussed how and why of organic farming.

The talks covered chemical free organic farming, sensible gardening practices, as well as a lot of science and experience. Peggy added value to the tour by adding her knowledge and experience into the discussion, including pointers to how things are in Assam, India and how things need to improve, so that pesticides can be taken out of the equation and healthy soil can be preserved and nourished without the need for factory produced toxic chemicals or fertilizers.

Thierry has been many things in his professional life. But for us, his most notable knowledge comes from plant pathology, molecular biology and his experience as a genetic engineer, along with his knowledge that the GMO science is based on old and wrong perceptions of the nature and function of genes. This knowledge is not discussed in this opening section of the video. You need to stay tuned and watch the rest as they are edited and put up.

Thierry Vrain – Part 1 : Thierry  talks to us on medicinal gardens, plants and food.  If chosen well, how our food and lifestyle can cure some decease, even repress or slowdown Cancer. Cancer, which might be considered a decease of old age, is coming up more frequently among the young, and is related to stress, though it has a genetic base. The stress can be from harmful chemicals, physical stress, emotional trauma, could be related to how one lives his/her life, etc.  Then Thierry goes on to describe the garden and its mulch, and how he makes compost out of rotting hay, seaweed, dead leaves etc. And then he shows us how to use natural ingredients to conserve soil health, and explains his own training and work background.

There are many more video clips to be added shortly, so watch this space.

[youtube r48HqSEQYfA]

Thierry Vrain – Part 2: We get a tour around the farm, starting with the meditating labyrinth that they made in the corner which is full of gravel and not suitable for growing vegetables. The adjacent pond is blue-green from the minerals in the clay at the bottom of the pond. Moving on to the vegetable garden, Thierry explains how some medicinal plants are also good as source for mulch that keeps the sun from drying out the soil, and helps growth of micro organisms to work on the fallen vegetation and turn it all into soil nutrient. There is also a fast scene of Thierry’s cat surviving an eagle attack.

[youtube S6X1dKnAgAQ]

Thierry Vrain – Part 3: We spend 21 minutes out in Thierry’s farm and learn about soil biology and the role played by bacteria, fungi, and how photosynthesis was invented by the bacteria before implanting themselves into evolving trees that had the chloroplast. He and Peggy join talks with Tony in explaining how the sunlight and CO2 are worked on by the trees along with nutrients from the soil, and how the tree takes and also gives back into the soil sugars and proteins for the bacteria and fungi that in turn give the plants the minerals it needs. It is necessary to understand the relationship, so that agriculture can be understood and why industrial chemical or GMO are not the solution to either improve plant biology, or soil condition or nutrition value in our food.

[youtube TDuKW4c1cEU]

Exposing the faulty science behind GMO

Thierry Vrain – Part 4: In this video of under 12 minutes, Dr. Thierry Vrain comes to describe his profession as a soil biologist turned genetic engineer, and explained how, since the human genome project was completed in 2002, it dawned on folks on the complexity of genes that shattered the old idea of a one-gene one-protein theory. This also meant, the GMO technology used by the biotech industry was based on a faulty assumption of how genes work, and how dangerous the consequences of that faulty science can be.

[youtube _haVyyFfnA8]

PODCAST : At bottom of this page, and also on iTunes, is the 12 and half minute audio podcast of the above video #4, on GMO.

Whats up with Comox Valley ?

I have to thank Dr. Debal Deb of Odisha, India, and the small farmers in the foothills of the Himalayas in the northeastern Indian province of Assam, for making it possible for me to meet up with so many remarkable organic farmers and anti-GMO activists in Comox Valley, Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

Peggy Carswell

Peggy searched for Dr. Debal Deb from Odisha, India, and found me, from Delta, Canada instead.

If you want to know how someone in India whose last name seems like a truncated version of is first name, and small farmers of the foothills of Himalayas could possibly have any connection with Comox valley – you need to speak with Peggy Carswell and her NGO the Fertile Ground.

The thing is – she was searching for her friend Dr. Debal Deb on the internet, and found me, Debal’s friend, who had interviewed him over the phone and made a few videos about Debal’s views on GMO, sustainable farming and seed preservation. And thus, she found me. And how did Peggy Carswell of Comox Valley know Debal Deb of India? Thats another story, and you might have to ask Ms Pompy Ghosh of Assam, India, about it some day. But, let me not get any deeper into that, and try to refocus on the Comox Valley. Assam, and Pompy, and Peggy, and Debal Deb and others will get into my blog more in future, I believe. Meanwhile this blog is about people from an island off the west coast of Canada, standing up for the quality of our food, who should grow it, and how it should be grown.

Ellen Rainwalker

Ellen Rainwalker

That was not all. There was also the matter of Ms Arzeena Hamir of the Amara Farm and Dr. Thierry Vrain and Chanchal of Innisfree Farm. If you are wondering who these people with strange names are – you need to visit Comox Valley some day. And if you like colourful, exotic names, you should also consider inviting yourself at one of the Comox Valley Food Round Table (CVFRT) meetings there. You might get to know wonderful ladies with names such as Ellen Rainwalker.

Okay, so what exactly is happening in Comox Valley? White Tailed Deer and Tonu figure each other out.For one thing, a couple of yearling White tailed deer fawns following a very pregnant mother might be browsing outside your bedroom window in the morning. If they have not seen you before, or heard your strange accent, they might fix their large eyes on you and turn their large ears to catch your words, before arriving at the logical conclusion that you were neither much to look at, nor to listen to, before turning around with an air of supreme indifference and proceeding with their browsing. That was happening in the valley often enough around Railway avenue, the River Road, and another road called the Headquarter road. There is no Headquarter there. Not even a Tailquarter. But the name was relevant, I am told, because the valley once had an operating coal mine and a mining town around the area.

A couple of peacocks kept yelling at the world from across the woods. I never saw any during my stay, but heard them often enough, and was told that a nearby resident had a few, and allowed them sufficient free speech so they could announce their existence a few dozen times a day. There were also less noisy resident belted kingfishers, mallards, rufous hummingbirds, woodpeckers, warblers and other birds.

Among the humankind, Peggy and Kel kept us enchanted with their beautiful home and hospitality. I came away with the knowledge that the two of them had a larger heart than I could muster, not to mention Peggy was a great organizer when it came to supporting sustainable farming in Assam, India, and Kel was way better a handy man than me.

Eduardo, partner, and hemp

Eduardo, Ann, and edible hemp.

There are lots of other things happening in the community. For example, there is a vibrant weekend farmers market. I did meet a lot of folks there, and made video clips of them talking about their products and feelings on the issue of organic farming and clean food. Eduardo and Ann had a stall, and they were selling edibles made from hemp. I tried a round sweet with hemp seeds in it, that was the shape of an Indian laddu, a round ball slightly larger than a ping pong ball. It tasted sweet and great.

Moss at her stall

Moss at her stall

Then there was Ms Moss, a young organic farmer selling her wares. It was wonderful noticing younger generation getting in on organic farming and re-linking with the food web. She had samples of farm fresh vegetables and pamphlets that encouraged folks to support local farm produce. Peggy told me about her efforts and goals, and so I went and recorded her talking about her work. She thought my camera was awesome. I thought she was awesome.

There were lots of other great guys at the farmers market, and all of them deserve special mention. They, collectively, are our food preservers and seed savers, a profoundly important task, though they remain in the fringes of the urban media radar, and at the periphery of our social consciousness. This needs to change.

Thierry points to where GMO might belog - far away from our kitchen.

Is Thierry pointing to where GMO might belong – far away from our food chain?

I was fortunate to meet Dr. Thierry Vrain and Chanchal and interview them at their Innisfree farm. All that will come up shortly, on another blog, as well as in podcast and video. Meanwhile, I got a few shots of expressive Thierry. Here he might be pointing where GMO should be – far away, over the hills and across the oceans, preferably outside of the gravitational field of the planet earth, and out of our market, fridge and kitchen.

Chanchal

Chanchal Cabrera of Innisfree Farm

Chanchal Cabrera, despite her Indian sounding first name and Latin sounding last name, is a Scotswoman with finely chiselled features and mischievous eyes. She carries the last name from her previous marriage. But her first name was adopted by her, and given by a guru in India long ago. She had agreed to see me Sunday afternoon for an hour, and talked about her learning, her passion and her work with Growing Wellness, with herbal tea, vegetable and fruits, apothecary and culinary gardens and meditating labyrinth. She is a medical herbalist, a clinical aromatherapist, and a horticultural therapist among other things, and is connected with the Boucher Institute of Naturopathic Medicine in New Westminster, BC.

I had the good fortune to visit quite a few organic and original farms. one of them was Eatmore Sprouts of Ms Carmen Wakeling and interviewed her in the morning of Sunday, April 28th. She was gracious enough to take time out from her day of rest, to show me around and have a chat with me and be recorded. Her farm was amazing, but she too was very concerned about the GMO issue, and especially the GM alfalfa that was bearing down over the horizon. Her farm sold sprouts that was for human consumption.

Carmen Wakeling

Carmen Wakeling of Eatmore Sprouts

She sells sprouted seeds, but her business model does not not leave room for her to save seeds for replanting. She therefore depended on importing non-GM organic seeds, and stood to lose both her source of seed, and her customers, if GM alfalfa was to contaminate naturally grown Alfalfa. She was also working with the large dairy farmers, who used GM corn to feed their cows and were the main opposition to turning the island free from GMO up and down the food web. Carmen had a progressive solution driven approach. She did not want to see the dairy farmers antagonized by fingers pointing at them. The idea was to find a solution by which all could exist, including dairy farmers, and without use of pesticides and genetically engineered ingredients in the cattle feed. A tall task, and something that perhaps needed the collective will and effort of everybody, including consumers, policy makers and investors. We all have our share of duty.

While I was sitting with her, a flock of blackbirds chased a Kestrel. She mentioned that a pair of American Kestrels were nesting on her property, and was the cause of much mobbing and chasing by smaller perching birds that considered the Kestrel an unwelcome intruder in their lives.

CVFRT meeting - April 29, 2013

CVFRT meeting – April 29, 2013. Can you locate Ellen Rainwalker, who had the best name among us all?

Comox Valley Food Round Table (CVFRT) meeting for the Comox Valley citizens was an interesting event where I was allowed to sit in, record the proceedings, take a few pictures, and even put in my two cents here and there. I found it very encouraging, and something that others should also do if not already in it, to discuss various issues relating to supporting efforts to grow local, organic food, to raise awareness on it, and to join hands in collective efforts to resist takeover by corporate invested industrial farming with sprayed pesticides and GMO. I found it refreshing to sit with them, and thank them for allowing a rank outsider to listen in.

Arzeena Hamir of Amara Farm

Arzeena Hamir of Amara Farm

The story of my visit to Comox Valley was to be bracketed by Peggy and Kel on one side, and with Arzeena Hamir of Amara farm on the other. A newcomer to the valley, she had a spanking new home that was heated by a combination of geothermal and solar energy. She was growing multiple kinds of vegetables, and leasing part of her land to UBC agricultural graduates to grow fruit trees. She and her busband where both agrologists that had worked around the world, and had vast experience and conviction on the value of good nutrition as well as rural grassroots level socio-economic development involving a model that included growing food that was chemical free and genetically untampered, non-industrial natural farming by small farmers, supported by their local communities. All this is going to come out in videos and podcasts. This is my first writeup, hurried as it is, within the first 24 hours since my return home from Comox valley.

I hope to be coming back to the valley again sometime, perhaps in the summer when things get more hectic. My parting words for the valley is – YOU ROCK.

Kel, Peggy, Anu and yours truely

Kel, Peggy, Anu and yours truely

Letters to Vancouver Sun about GMO

4v208_VancouverSun

This issue covers letters written to Vancouver Sun rebutting an industry lobby group’s letter to editor that provides misinformation to promote GM seeds. People that wrote the letters read them out for the Podcast, such as Phil Harrison, Bobbie BLair, and myself. You can find it at the bottom of this blog page.

Not a dull moment. A few days ago, I was unaware of the existence of CropLife Canada or its link with GMO. By today, I have seen a dozen people write to the Vancouver Sun, protesting a letter published there on April 22, by the president of CropLife, Lorne Hepworth. I learned that in effect CropLife has financial incentive to see more sale of Monsanto agri-products in Canada.

I came to know if it through emails, linking the web page for the digital version of the paper. Then I found reference to it on Facebook and on Twitter. I finally saw the actual article on a hard copy of the paper at Mr. Tal Lee’s home.

The article promotes GMO for Canada, claims that modern plant breeding technology helps the farmer, is safe for humans and environment and makes food cheaper. It claims farmers across the world are rapidly adopting GM seeds. It also claims millions of farmers in 28 countries are planting biotech crops. It does not substantiate its claims, most of which could be considered as misinformation.

So, in response, a number of folks wrote back to the news paper with their views. I was one of them. We decided not only to write to Vancouver Sun, but to create our own news outlets. This blog is one of them. We shall also read aloud our letters and create audio files for podcasts that will appear in this blog and also on iTunes.

Here is the first response to it, from Ms Bobbie Blair of Langley, BC:

From: Bobbie Blair
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 6:00 PM
To: ‘sunletters@vancouversun.com
Subject: CropLife Industry Propaganda… masked as a story?
Hello,

I am a Langley resident who has a busy life, as a mom with a young child who also has a demanding career. However, since last summer, I have taken time that I DON’T ACTUALLY HAVE away from work and family, to try to create awareness in our community about the frightening implications of transgenic (GMO) crops. I came across this story you published today:

http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Genetically+modified+food+welcome+innovation/8275752/story.html

After learning about GMOs and then doing more research, I was absolutely shocked that our governments were allowing Biotech corporations like Monsanto to not only play with nature (genetic pollution cannot be contained once released into the environment), but to play roulette with our health as well.  We are not talking about hybridization, but activities are “invasive to the plant at a cellular level” inserting foreign DNA (animal, human) into plants, and even, as in BT corn and BT cotton, inserting the insecticide into the cells of plants, so that the plant “grows” its own insecticide from the inside out (and then we eat that corn in our processed foods, and eat the meat and dairy from animals fed this stuff… YUMMO!)  But Monsanto (the largest Biotech corporation) created DDT, Agent Orange, PCBs and RoudUp, so they are a chemical company looking to control the seed market and the chemical pesticide and herbicides used.  In Monsanto’s perfect world, all seeds grown are patented by them, and sprayed with their chemicals worldwide. This is their mission. CropLife works for them, promoting their products. Simple as that.

GMOs are patented seeds that have NEVER been independently tested for safety by either our government, not the US government. On top of this, many farmers have been destroyed by the patented seeds blowing into their fields. (Destroyed financially, emotionally and also literally due to farmer suicides).  Biotech corporations have been given the authority, under patent law, to sue a farmer for patent infringement when in fact he does not want their seeds, and their presence in his fields is unwelcome. (Any right- thinking person of average intelligence sees at once that this is not right, and not the way laws normally are written in a great country such as ours).  Why is it that the Biotech Industry is allowed to bully farmers, and put their untested (“scientific” studies paid for and conducted by the Biotech industry do NOT count) Franken foods into our food system UNLABELLED? Does any of this sound exaggerated?? I will tell you, I thought a lot of the stuff I came across online had to be exaggerated, as it was so outrageous, so I went to the SFU library, where I found books that supported the horrifying stuff I discovered online. I am not a Genetic Scientist or a professor of Biology or Environmental Studies or anyone with such credentials, but I can put you in touch with such experts, if you wish.

 I will tell you, it is EXTREME CONCERN that forces a busy working mom like myself, to take time that I do not have to spare, become an activist and take up a cause.  However, I realized that if we do not wake up and take back control of our food, our farmers are going to be reduced to serfs of corporations, and we will lose all choice and access to truly natural and organically grown food. I feel like I am fighting for my daughter’s future, and that we are actually standing at a crossroads right now.  It is hurtful and painful for someone like me, when I am trying so hard to expose the truth and spread awareness, to then see a respectable newspaper like the Vancouver Sun allow Crop Life to print pure industry propaganda, to further confuse a society that already lacks important information.

I can only assume that you were not aware of what you were publishing when you ran the above story created by CropLife. Please do an online search on Monsanto, because CropLife works for them, and present the real facts, to set the story straight.  As a respected and responsible newspaper, this is the only right thing to do. We rely on local media to be the voice of the people, and a vehicle of truth. I am sure that now that you know, you will set the record straight.

Bobbie Blair

 Next, is the letter written by Phil Harrison:
From: PHIL Harrison
Subject: Letter to editor
Date: 22 April, 2013 11:12:50 PM PDT
To: News <sunletters@vancouversun.com>
 
Dear editor:
 
I like to respond to the one sided article  “Genetically modified food is welcome innovation”.  It should be noted that Crop Life Canada represents Monsanto and the other companies making genetically modified organisms, GMOs. The information presented is very much the industry spin. 
  
The article talks about the claims of reduced herbicide use that these products allow.  Although this is true for the first few years, over time the weeds develop a resistance to the herbicide.  This has forced farmers to spray more and more herbicide for the same result.  The resistance now has developed to the point that many weeds are completely immune.  Monsanto has addressed this by developing new, more toxic versions of herbicide resistance plants.  I think this proves that the reduced pesticide use claim now being made is at best misleading, if not downright dishonest.
 
Another point I’d like to make is on the safety testing of GMOs.  There are no independent studies done on new GMOs being released into the market place.  All studies done in North America are done by industry.  The company standing to make an immense amount of money on the release of the GMOs can not be trusted to make an honest assessment of their safety.  However, Health Canada takes industry’s assurance of safety at face value and approves them.  This process does not give me any confidence in the integrity of the process.
 
I’d like to point out that 65 districts and municipalities in BC have been persuaded of their risks to pass resolutions opposing GMOs being grown in their area.
I hope that the paper will print an article that discusses the many health and environmental risks these products pose.
 
Phil Harrison

Next is my letter:

From: Tony Mitra
Subject: Genetically modified food is not yet welcome
Date: 23 April, 2013 1:06:56 AM PDT
To: sunopinion@vancouversun.com
 
Re: Letter to the editor dated April 22, 2013 – Genetically modified food is welcome innovation
 
 
The article declares opinion and not factual data on benefit of GM food. 
 
Since the technology is primarily poison related, with pesticide in the soil, or toxin in plant  DNA, precautionary principle calls for a thorough independent long term analysis of potential harm to health and environment and potential loss of biodiversity.
 
There is evidence that with the introduction of GM crop, alternative seeds slowly disappear, leaving the patented GM seed as the sole option in a model that promotes mono-culture. This in effect amounts to a loss of biodiversity, and a shrinkage of seed independence and food security of a nation.
 
The Irish potato famine is a good example where the whole nation was planting only one kind of crop, and when a specialized pest attacked it, it destroyed the entire nations potato and brought on their worst famine in history. There is a danger of that happening with mono-culture regime in any crop.
 
There is also the issue of food security and if Canadian farmers should lose the ability to choose what variety of crop strain they wish to plant, and only have one kind of patented seed available in the market, controlled by a foreign corporation. This can be taken as a nation losing its food independence.
 
Finally, the patent holders exert an unprecedented control over lab analysis of their products claiming intellectual property rights. Only with permission of the patent holder can scientific study be done on merit of GM seeds. Even then, the results must be shown to the patent holder before publication and if the result is not flattering, it cannot be published. In short, the patent holder has the veto power to stop any negative report of their product. In a letter published in Scientific American magazine in Aug 2009 the editors write that scientists must ask seed companies for permission before publishing independent research on genetically modified crops, and that this restriction must end. The very fact that analysis is restricted raises doubt about the usefulness of GM food.
 
There is an increasing body of evidence and data available from outside of North America, such as from Europe and India which raises doubts about Genetically modified seeds.
 
Further, there is a rise in obesity and other problems of health in the US over the past decade, along with similar increase in average intake of GM food per person. This does not definitively prove a link between GM food and ill-health. However, it indicates a possibility. Therefore, even more rigorous study should be made to check possible negative health effects of GM food.
 
It is important to remember that it took a hundred years to establish a definite link between smoking and lung cancer. Therefore, with just a decade of use of GM food products, and without serious independent scientific analysis of their effect, one cannot claim that GM crops pose no health risks to mankind.
 
Therefore, it stands to reason that Canada should consider a moratorium on any GM crop till such time as more definitive scientific analyses can be concluded that prove these crops to be either beneficial or otherwise.
 
Tony Mitra

And here is a letter written by Dr. Thierry Vrain, rebutting a different but related piece by Robert Wager of Comox Valley (http://www.canada.com/What+really+happened+AVICC+regarding/8280922/story.html). We got the rebuttal from Thierry himself in an email.

Dear Mr Wager,

I retired 10 years ago after a long career as a research scientist for Agriculture Canada.  When I was on the payroll I was the designated scientist of my Institute to address public groups and reassure them that genetically engineered crops and foods were safe.   I don’t know if I was passionate about it but I was knowledgeable.   Like you I took side and I defended the bright side.  The side of technological advance, of science and progress.  

  I have in the last 10 years changed my position.  I started paying attention to the flow of published studies coming from Europe, some from prestigious labs and published in prestigious scientific journals, that questioned the impact and safety of engineered food.  I was the speaker after you at the AVICC convention in Sooke.  Your presentation intended to reassure the audience that genetic engineering is necessary to feed the hungry world of the future, and that the food derived from engineered crops is not different from the non engineered food.  I thought it was bold of you to make the sweeping statement during the question period that all I had said was pseudo-science.  You appear to be a passionate man, emotional and knowledgeable about your topic.   And very dedicated to reassure the public in your opinion letters to the Globe and Mail and other newspapers.  

In my presentation following yours I refuted each of the claims of the biotechnology companies that their engineered crops yield more, that they require less pesticide applications, that they have no impact on the environment and of course that they are safe to eat.  My presentation was basically a review of over 100 separate published studies.   There is a good number of scientific studies that have been done for Monsanto by Universities in the USA, Canada, and abroad.   Most of these studies are concerned with the field performance of the engineered crops, and of course they find GMOs safe for the environment and therefore safe to eat.  There is however an overwhelming and growing body of scientific research done mostly in Europe, Russia, and other countries, showing that diets containing engineered corn or soya cause serious health problems in laboratory mice and rats.  Mice and rats are the canary in the mine.  We use them to test the safety of a lot of pharmaceuticals and other chemicals.  We should all take these studies seriously and demand that the government agencies replicate them rather than rely on studies paid for by the biotech companies.

The Bt corn and soya plants that are now everywhere in our environment, are registered as insecticides.  But are these insecticidal plants regulated and have their proteins been tested for safety?   Not by the federal departments in charge of food safety, not in Canada and not in the USA.   There are no long term feeding studies performed in these countries to demonstrate the claims that engineered corn and soya are safe.   All we have are scientific studies out of Europe and Russia, showing that rats fed engineered food die prematurely, with breast cancer, and kidney and liver damage.   All these studies are compiled and referenced in a report published last June called GMO Myths and Truths – available for free at Earth Open Source.

These studies show that proteins produced by engineered plants are different than what they should be.   Inserting a gene in a genome using this technology can and does result in damaged proteins.  The scientific literature is full of studies showing that engineered corn and soya contain toxic or allergenic proteins.  

Genetic engineering is 40 years old.  It is based on the naïve understanding of the genome based on the One Gene – one Protein hypothesis of 70 years ago, that each gene codes for a single protein.  The Human Genome project completed in 2002 showed that this hypothesis is wrong.  The whole paradigm of the genetic engineering technology is based on a misunderstanding, and ignoring of the new knowledge.  Every scientist now learns that any gene can give more than one protein and that inserting a gene anywhere in a plant eventually creates rogue proteins.   Some of these proteins are obviously allergenic or toxic.  

It appears that many people in the Comox Valley are concerned enough.  Our latest local poll in the CV Echo was 95% of people in this valley want labeling or an outright ban of engineered product.   This is our local reality, I cannot speak for the rest of Vancouver Island but I suspect that the AVICC delegates voted “what their constituents want”.

Thank you for your consideration Mr Wager, I don’t suppose that we will ever reconcile our positions.   For my part I will keep pushing and writing to alert the public and government agencies until the safety studies are initiated.  I assume that you will keep your reassuring stance as well.

Respecfully,

Dr. Thierry Vrain

Next letter is from Brandie Nadiger-Harrop, which is expected to be published in Vancouver sun by Friday, April 26th.

Brandie Nadiger-Harrop to Vancouver Sun
 
My take on the GMO food in our food system
 
Recent stories, studies and suggestions have been surfacing regarding genetically modified organisms, and the confusion out there has inspired me to write what I have learned over the years in my own research on the subject.
 
There are no government agencies anywhere doing long-term testing on the safety of genetically engineered (or GMO) crops. Nearly all studies on the subject are funded and supported by the biotechnology industry and it’s peers. The USA called the engineered products “substantially equivalent” to their conventional counterparts, and that has been used, unquestioningly and blindly, as a scientific truth with zero independent research supporting the phrase. 
 
GMOs are NOT good for the environment. Cross contamination with conventional and organic crops destroys any options for people who do not want to consume GMO & for food companies that don’t want to use them. The diversity of our food supply is dwindling due to GMOs as older varieties fade away in the world of the monocultured GM fields and as contamination spreads. There is also the fact that since the excessive growing of GM crops, the bees and butterflies are dying. We need our pollinators for food, we MUST look into this! Herbicide being sprayed directly onto GM Roundup Ready crops is now being found in the air we breathe, the water we drink and in our food. The government’s answer to this? Raise the acceptable level of what the food contains! That is looking out for our health and well being?
 
Recent tests also show that the natural microbial balance in our soil is dying off, affecting worms and all aspects of our croplands. We are effectively killing our growing medium with these products! That is good for us or our environment? In David Suzuki’s documentary, the Silent Forest, he talks about how the toxins living inside the plant leach into the ground and eventually into our water. 
 
Biotech industries would have you believe that farmers are embracing GMOs but I beg to differ. The farmers at my farmer’s market have all lobbied the government in protest to no avail. If the farmers are embracing them, then why is the National Farmer’s Union doing mass protests like the Canada-wide Day of Action on April 9th to protest GMO alfalfa? That doesn’t really sound much like “embracing” to me. 
There are new studies coming out every week on the potential risks of GMOs, but no one seems to be listening. A long term study in France came out at the end of last year proving that GMO’s and glyphosate cause tumours, cancer and infertility. Take a look at the human cancer numbers before genetic engineering, and after it infiltrated 80% of out processed foods. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that something is dreadfully wrong with our food supply. Lack of labeling has made it impossible to directly tie GM ingredients to disease, and that is a wise angle the biotech companies spend millions on to defend.
 
Biotech companies would have the public believe that protesters are few and using old data to create fear mongering, that the majority of the public and farmers want this. If most are for this, why is Canada starting to protest? Canadians almost never protest. How are we able to organize country-wide protests and having good turnouts at every rally all across Canada, with the farmers AND the consumer? If the world really loves this then why are they banned or labeled in 61 countries?? Probably not because they think GMOs are safe. Also, if the world is “embracing GMOs”, why is there a worldwide protest happening on May 25th? 252 cities in 37 countries on 7 continents?? It is going to be the largest world protest ever seen. That once again doesn’t sound like the world embracing GMO, it sounds like the world is embracing their right to NOT have GMOs on their plates or in their countries. 
 
The biotech industry would love for the public to believe that anti-GMO supporters are a few crazy people belonging to special interest groups that are more concerned with fundraising than with health concerns. The people of many groups such as GMO Free Canada and Millions Against Monsanto all donate their time and efforts, using money out of their own pockets to fund their printing and travel. The organic industry pays with their own money to defend their livelihood from GMO contamination. 
 
BC now has 16 GMO free zones and Vancouver Island is now fighting to become a GMO free zone. That’s a lot more than just a select few crazy misinformed people…THAT is the GENERAL PUBLIC!
sincerely Brandie Harrop 
member of the board GMO Free Canada

 

PODCAST

We are trying to get folks that wrote the letter to read them out in their own voice, to prepare an audio podcast of it. So far we have only a few letters covered. But we expect the podcast to get longer as more contribute. You can find the podcast at the bottom of this page.

A talk with Rajesh Krishnan of Greenpeace India

Rajesh Krishnan, Greenpeace, India

On April 18, 2013, I spoke with Mr. Rajesh Krishnan, to learn about the current situation with GMO crops in India, from the perspective of Greenpeace.

Rajesh Krishnan is a sustainable agriculture campaigner at Greenpeace India.

The 29 minute conversation is included in the podcast link at the bottom of this page. A brief summary given below:

  1. India needs a shift in paradigm, away from industrial, input intensive, resource destroying model, to a sustainable one.
  2. Farmer suicide escalated since 1990s. To say farmer suicide have not been aggravated by GM crops would be like shutting your eyes from light. The suicide increased with industrial agriculture. With the last decade, adoption of MG crop has aggravated the need for more chemicals, more water input, more cost, and has increased the slope of the economic treadmill of the farmers. The need of pesticides have not gone down. It has increased. Along with need for more fertilizers. So GMO have increased the level of farmer distress, which was already bad since western agri-model was introduced here.
  3. Pesticide usage has had a serious impact on the environment. It kills various organisms in the soil, even beneficial ones that would themselves have attacked and controlled  pests. Pesticide spoils soil condition. The left over plant matter of the Bt. Cotton itself has also lead to harmful impact on the soil microbes, thus destroying the soil fertility.
  4. There are reports in Andhra Pradesh that sheep that browsed on the cotton plants after harvesting of Bt Cotton fields got sick or died. Animal husbandry department issued a notice advising against letting sheep graze on Bt cotton fields. But the genetically engineered crop appraisal body stated that the sheep death are not related to Bt Cotton. Several scientists have challenged this and claimed that there is not enough proof that the sheep death are not linked to Bt toxin, while circumstantial evidence points to a possible link.
  5. This may become an election issue. During the last election, the ruling party waived some farm loans as a temporary solution to farmer distress. This amounts to addressing the symptom rather than providing any real solution.
  6. The Govt is openly pushing for smaller farmers to leave farming, so that larger industrial farming can step in. But, there is no alternative employment available for the huge farming community. So they come to cities and become slum dwellers. There is evidence now that as soon as people lose their land, their food security falls drastically, and adds to the distress level of the internal migrants. It is going from bad to worse for the farmers in the country.
  7. Will there be an electoral backlash next year ? Well, there is no revolution yet from the distressed farmers – but there is a simmering swell of resistance ongoing for a while. Also, there has a very vibrant civil society that is pushing the Govt to seek long term sustainable solution to farming. This effort has cushioned the shock and in effect may be converting a potential revolution into an gradual evolution of farm policies.
  8. The moratorium on Bt. Brinjal (eggplant) has effectively stopped comercialization of all GM crops as well as its field trials, except for Bt. Cotton that is already in use.
  9. Agriculture is a federal issue according to the Indian constitution. However, provinces can say “no” to field trials. As such many provinces have complained to the federal Govt that field trials of GM crops have been started in their states without their agreement. Because of these oppositions, the central Govt has issued a directive that any application for field trial of GM crops in India would require a “no objection” certificate from the appropriate departments from the state Govt. This directive was enacted by the Govt of India in 2012. Since most provinces are showing reluctance to GM crop trials, even field trials are gradually coming to a halt.
  10. Civil society is now calling India to enact a bio-safety protection regime to safeguard India’s agriculture and environment from unintended harmful effect of badly designed GM crops. The idea is for the new law to adopt a “precautionary” approach to authorizing GM technology into the environment or the food chain.
  11. India will need continuous and sustained mass movement and public pressure to resist the enormous push by big money and corporations to take over the agriculture sector. India will need a continuous and wide ranging involvement of a lot of citizens in the country to be to maintain that public pressure to ensure food safety and biodiversity remains healthy and vibrant.
  12. There is an unfortunate situation in India were its traditional and homegrown knowledge is not given its due when compared to western imported industrial technics of agriculture. That is also why people who object to GM and industrial chemical dependent agriculture are branded as anti-science or back dated. But actually the civil society is not against science. There is a need to separate science from technology, and from tested, good technology from harmful tools. But the GMO lobby does not wish to get into those nuanced discussions. They simply paint every one raising questions as anti-science.
  13. India has moved in one decade from a place where there was no knowledge or debate on GMO to a place where there is a rising level of involvement and a very vibrant debate on GMO on agriculture. Latest is a strong group of scientists that have taken up this issue and criticizing the mindless way that the Govt of India is trying to push GMO for the benefit of corporations without regard to safety of the people.
  14. The agriculture minister, Mr. Sharad Pawar has been going around stating that if India does not adopt GM crop technology, then India’s food security may be compromised. Many different groups came out publicly opposing this view. The scientific community has come forward challenging this view and has pointed to scientific data how GM crops are not suitable for improving food security. Other civil society groups like “right to food” campaign, the farmer’s union, are all challenging that argument. It has been interesting to see how the debate on GM crop has evolved in India over the past decade, and all are now asking for a “precautionary” approach to GM crop, instead of a “promotional” approach.

A vote for Wally

Wally Martin, our good friend from Langley, BC, has decided to contest the coming provincial election in May from his constituency, on the Green Party platform. A self employed small businessman with an inclination to believe in long term sustainable solutions rather than the current trend of politicians, offering instant short term fixes for everything.

A committed environmentalist and a decent human with an inclusive political outlook to life focussed on sustainability and long term goals, he hopes to serve his community and the Canadian people into refocussing and looking generations into the future, instead of looking for solutions that last for a month or a season.

I spoke with Wally on phone on 11th of April 2013, about his decision to stand for election in a 3 minute statement. Then on April 16th, Wally read out another statement about himself, in another short talk. Both of these were recorded and have now been converted to podcast, linked below.

Wally Martin - Measure once, cut twice

On 18th of April, I followed Wally as he went knocking on doors in is constituency, drumming up support for his candidacy. That was covered in the video below.

[youtube DrXYLBATDlI]

Good luck – Wally.

These are a few of my favorite things

There is an emerging story of our activity at this part of the world, towards efforts to push for sustainable and holistic farming. Folks used to write letters, physical letters, often hand written, then put it in an envelope, attach a stamp, and mail it.

Phil Harrison had arranged for Ms Doreen Dewell to speak about GMO at Fraser Valley University near Abbotsford.I went to attend and audio recorded her speech.

Phil Harrison

At FVU during Doreen Dewell’s talk on GMO

Folks don’t do that any more. Only thing you get by mail is bills and junk mail. Now folks send email, but that too is dying out. Folks send messages on phone, on Skype, on Facebook, Twitter, Google plus and God knows through how many more channels.

So, here is one of the things that I have been getting, and these are a few of my favorite things. GE free BC or GMO free BC (same thing) is something I got involved in, since I attended the Social Justice Film Festival in White Rock, and came to know Bobbie Blair, Phil Harrison and others.

An exchange with Donna Passmore

One thing lead to another. And thus, I ended up making that post on Twitter and getting a response, for example, from Donna Passmore of Farmland Defence of White Rock. I am nota hundred percent sure what Farmland Defence is – but I guess I shall find out soon enough.

We need a local champion in White Rock, a resident, who will take this up, and we shall be helping and supporting him. I do not live in White Rock myself. Phil Harrison does not either. Rick Ketcheson lives there, but he is focussing on gardening in White Rock. So, we are still in search for a champion for GE free White Rock.

Then, I’d like to mention Organic Whole Foods. They have a presence in Twitter – @OrganicLiveFood, with the face of a woman. She is a live wire and a super-prolific tweet person with almsot a single handed focus on informing people against GMO and against questionable chemical dependent farming. She has almost 80,000 followers. I am one of them, because she single handedly focuses against Monsanto and the GM-biotech industry. I suppose she is raising awareness and public interest in eating safe food, and the organisation she is working for, intends to promote and sell organic only food.Coca Cola Anyone ?

So, anyhow, she complained about supporters of Coca Cola & Pepsi apparently tried to tell her followers that she had been misinforming people about those beverages. That got my attention. And I had to respond. I dug up Sunita Narain’s great work in India about these beverage giants and how they hoodwink the people, selling junk beverages, stealing free the ground water supply from the area, reducing the availability of good water for the villagers and passing contaminants into the drink.

Carcinogen in Coke - India

So I passed some of that info onto her and her followers. This is a good way, as good as many others, in passing information and raising general awareness, I guess. But the real treat is watching Sunita Narain herself.

[youtube Z6rCdAnOJSo]

Meanwhile, Lucy Fischetti Nickel drew my attention to something going on on the GMO Free Canada page on Facebook. The tread started with a poster and dealt with Monsanto and a new bill being signed in the US, that presumably makes it difficult for people to sue Monsanto, or something.

So, on that FB page, there was a sort of argument ongoing between two sides. And one of them, questioning those that wish the bill, which the identify as a Monsanto Protection Bill, had not passed.
One of the comments drew my attention. The question was, if GMO crop contained poison and lots of folks were being poisoned without their knowledge, why was there not a charge brought against the supplier of the GMO?

Well, I thought I might post there. But the thread, strangely, appeared to be frozen and not accepting more comments. So, I shall make it here.

There is a trend that shows how corporations do not get charged, or any case do not get to pay for damages caused by their product.

Vietnamese folks did not get compensated for deaths, birth defects and health problems from exposure to Agent Orange.

Americans did not fully get compensated for lung decease from exposure to asbestos.

Americans did not get compensated for lung decease and other health problems from smoking, while products did not carry adequate health warnings. 

Relatives of 25,000 Indians that died from exposure to cyanide from a leaking Union Carbide plant in Bhopal, India in the 1980s did not get compensated till date.

When methane and other nasty stuff is coming up into ground water and soil due to fracking, folks are not getting compensated.

There are umpteen examples of Corporations either avoiding getting charged, or avoiding getting penalized for what may amount to crime against humanity.

Why is justice thus denied? You tell me.

Monsanto just gave you one more reason.

From: PHIL Harrison

Subject: Monsanto just gave you one more reason.

Date: 25 March, 2013 9:27:41 PM PDT

Below is information about the Washington State mandatory gmo labelling ballot initiative.

Although not about Surrey, this is an important local opportunity.   This can succeed, after the recount in California the NO side won by less than 1%, even after outspending on advertising by about 10:1.

Please consider donating.  See below for details.

thank you

Phil Harrison

GE Free Surrey

 ———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Ronnie Cummins, Organic Consumers Association <ronniecummins@organicconsumers.org>

Date: 24 March 2013 07:06

Subject: Monsanto just gave you one more reason.

To: thebigph@gmail.com

Dear Organic Consumer,

As if the existing threats to our health and environment weren’t enough reason to fight for labels on food containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs), Monsanto just gave us one more.

Three days ago, bowing down to Monsanto’s well-funded lobbyists, Congress voted to allow Monsanto to grow GMO crops that could be harmful to human health and the environment – even if a federal court or a regulatory agency rules that the planting of those crops is illegal. Under this new law, sneaked in at the last moment as a rider to the federal appropriations bill, not even the federal courts will be able to stop Monsanto from introducing a slew of new, potentially poisonous GMO crops into our food supply.

It’s just one more reason to pass a statewide GMO labeling law, one with real teeth.

In November, voters in Washington State will decide on I-522, a citizens’ ballot initiative to label GMOs. The OCA has pledged $500,000 to the I-522 campaign.  If we raise half of that – $250,000 – by April 1, a generous donor will match those funds so we can fulfill our pledge. Can you help us reach our goal by April 1 with a donation today? You can donate online with a credit card or Paypal. Or you can mail a check. Or phone in your donation.

If you’ve already contributed to this campaign, thank you! Perhaps you can pass this message along to friends and family? If you haven’t donated yet, please consider a donation today. Every dollar counts toward this critical matching gift.

We’ve heard it many times, from food retailers and manufacturers, and especially from politicians, that what we need is a federal GMO labeling law. State laws would be too confusing, too difficult to enforce. But you and I both know that a law written in Washington D.C., where Monsanto lobbyists have politicians in their back pockets, will do more to protect Big Biotech and Big Food than it will to protect consumers.

I-522 is a citizens’ ballot initiative, written to protect consumers, not industry.

If you’re reading this letter, you probably supported a similar initiative last year, Prop 37, the California Right to Know GMO labeling law. And like me, you were deeply disappointed that we lost that fight.

You may be wondering, is it worth raising all this money again, for another, similar initiative? Yes. And here’s why.

  • This initiative stands an excellent chance of passing. With the FDA about to approve the first genetically engineered salmon, Washington State fishermen and consumers are fiercely determined to pass this law.
  • If we force food producers to label GMOs in Washington State, they may as well label in every other state.
  • Thanks to the groundwork we laid in California, the I-522 campaign is off to an early start and better able to anticipate the opposition’s strategy.
  • Thanks to your hammering of the food manufacturers who contributed millions to defeat Prop 37, those companies won’t likely throw more money at defeating I-522.
  • The advertising market in Washington is much smaller than the California market. Monsanto will no doubt saturate it. But because advertising there costs so much less, we will be able to reach every voter with our message, well before November. And at a far lower cost than it took to reach far fewer voters in California, where we couldn’t begin to compete until the final week of the campaign.

But the most compelling reason to support I-522 is that we must not throw away our investment in Prop 37, we must not let the momentum die, we must not give up the fight for a right so basic that it’s the law in 61 other countries.

Between today and April 1, your donation to the I-522 campaign will be worth twice as much, as long as we reach our goal of $250,000 and earn a matching gift. Every cent we raise will go directly to support the I-522 campaign. Please help us keep this fight alive with your donation today.

I’ve heard from so many people who were inspired by the work we did in California last year on this issue. I always tell them that we couldn’t have done it without our dedicated, determined, rabble-rousing supporters. You are not only the reason we do this work, you are the engine that drives this movement. Thank you.

In solidarity,

Ronnie Cummins
National Director, Organic Consumers Association and Organic Consumers Fund

P.S. Prop 37 would never have had the impact it had, without your support. Our $1.5 million donation to the campaign came from individual donations, from people like you. If you still believe in this fight, please donate today. Help us show Monsanto that we intend to win the GMO labeling battle!

Paid for by the Organic Consumers Fund Committee to Label GMOs in Washington State.

Please forward this publication to family and friends, place it on web sites, print it, duplicate it and post it freely. Knowledge is power!

6771 South Silver Hill Drive – Finland, MN 55603 – Phone: 218-226-4164 – Fax: 218-353-7652

Genetically Modified Crop and you

4v062_GMO_And_you

In my effort to collect video material within Utube that helps us understand the long term effects of Genetically Modified food, I have created this blog listing a series of very good videos called Genetically Modified Crops and you.

 

Genetically modified crops and you 1/10

Uploaded on 7 Mar 2010

Between 1997 and 2005, the total surface area of land cultivated with GMOs had increased by a factor of 50, from 17,000 km2 (4.2 million acres) to 900,000 km2 (222 million acres).

Although most GM crops are grown in North America, in recent years there has been rapid growth in the area sown in developing countries. For instance in 2005 the largest increase in crop area planted to GM crops (soybeans) was in Brazil (94,000 km2 in 2005 versus 50,000 km2 in 2004.) There has also been rapid and continuing expansion of GM cotton varieties in India since 2002. (Cotton is a major source of vegetable cooking oil and animal feed.) It is predicted that in 2008/9 32,000 km2 of GM cotton will be harvested in India (up more than 100 percent from the previous season).

Indian national average cotton yields of GM cotton were seven times lower in 2002, because the parental cotton plant used in the genetic engineered variant was not well suited to the climate of India and failed. The publicity given to transgenic trait Bt insect resistance has encouraged the adoption of better performing hybrid cotton varieties, and the Bt trait has substantially reduced losses to insect predation. Though controversial and often disputed, economic and environmental benefits of GM cotton in India to the individual farmer have been documented.

In 2003, countries that grew 99% of the global transgenic crops were the United States (63%), Argentina (21%), Canada (6%), Brazil (4%), China (4%), and South Africa (1%). The Grocery Manufacturers of America estimate that 75% of all processed foods in the U.S. contain a GM ingredient. In particular, Bt corn, which produces the pesticide within the plant itself, is widely grown, as are soybeans genetically designed to tolerate glyphosate herbicides. These constitute “input-traits” are aimed to financially benefit the producers, have indirect environmental benefits and marginal cost benefits to consumers.

In the US, by 2006 89% of the planted area of soybeans, 83% of cotton, and 61% corn were genetically modified varieties. Genetically modified soybeans carried herbicide-tolerant traits only, but maize and cotton carried both herbicide tolerance and insect protection traits (the latter largely the Bacillus thuringiensis Bt insecticidal protein). In the period 2002 to 2006, there were significant increases in the area planted to Bt protected cotton and maize, and herbicide tolerant maize also increased in sown area.

Information here from Wikipedia.org
Other useful sites:
http://www.thetruthaboutgmos.com/
http://www.gmofoodlabel.org/
http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Publi…
http://www.globalpolicy.org/component…
http://www.saynotogmos.org/
http://www.wikihow.com/Avoid-Genetica…

[youtube ltSG3GcLftU]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 2/10

Uploaded on 7 Mar 2010

[youtube hEuIi_avtoQ]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 3/10

[youtube JD7ydbJ9lAc]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 4/10

[youtube 1s88PzXonf4]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 5/10

[youtube QxJHK_y5IUY]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 6/10

[youtube BrdP9eMeLoE]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 7/10

[youtube m3VhSExSsAw]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 8/10

[youtube oS2d8UvcLSI]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 9/10

[youtube G8C_2SwUli4]

 

Genetically modified crops and you 10/10

[youtube LKcPa5nU7d0]

————————————————–

 

Canadian Farmer’s Testimonials on GM Alfalfa

[youtube qkWfGXlU8gA]

Published on 16 Jan 2013

Farmers from across Canada describe how genetically engineered (genetically modified or GM) alfalfa would affect them. Do farmers need GM alfalfa? This year there is a new industry push to pave the way to introduce GM alfalfa into Canada. The company Forage Genetics wants to sell GM alfalfa seeds in Canada (seeds with Monsanto’s Roundup Ready herbicide tolerant trait). Its not legal to sell GM alfalfa seeds in Canada until Forage Genetics gets variety registration. In October 2012, the industry group called the Canadian Seed Trade Association began to push a plan for “co-existence” of GM and non-GM alfalfa, to pave the way to introduce GM alfalfa in Canada via Ontario. However, “co-existence” is not possible – GM alfalfa cannot be controlled but will contaminate farmers’ fields across the country. Take action today or find out more info at www.cban.ca/alfalfa Thank you to the National Farmers Union for these testimonials and to the NFU Youth for producing this video.